
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
Get To Be familiar with The Historical backdrop Of Western Medication - 2
More people are addicted to marijuana, but fewer of them are seeking help, experts say - 3
More parents refusing this shot that prevents serious bleeding at birth - 4
Why are NASA's Artemis astronauts wearing orange? What are they bringing to space? What to know about the preparation for their moon mission. - 5
'Zootopia 2' movie reviews: A heartwarming, hysterical and earnest 'ode to community'
Instructions to Really Oversee Unsold SUVs in the Auto Business
The ‘Stranger Things’ finale, explained: What happens to Vecna? And why was a key character’s fate left unknown?
6 Popular Ladies' Aromas On the planet
Rubble, mud and hair: How to rebuild a home in Gaza
Your kid wants it now. What saying yes, no or not yet teaches kids about money and instant gratification.
Figure out How to Utilize Your Web based Advertising Degree to Break into the Tech Business
Astronauts welcome arrival of new crewmates | On the International Space Station this week Nov. 24-28, 2025
EU delegation urges China to tighten export controls
The Response to Independence from the rat race: Methodologies for Creating Financial momentum












